Latest Stories
Most recently published stories on Vocal.
The Geometry of Patience
Human life is a strange and beautiful architecture. It is a structure built not just of our successes and laughter, but of our silences, our shadows, and our struggles. As I reflect on the journey I am currently taking, I am struck by a peculiar habit of the human heart: we spend our days building monuments to our sorrows. We focus so intensely on the darkness of a single moment that we become blind to the vast, luminous light that has guided us for years.
By Shazzed Hossain Shajalabout 5 hours ago in Humans
In a Miami convenience store
This has nothing to do with my holiday in Miami but it was during my holiday in Miami I went to a convenience store for something and saw that Slim Jim was doing the right thing and honoring the memory of their longtime spokesperson and legendary WWE superstar Macho Man Randy Savage.
By Revista Mikoabout 5 hours ago in Wander
Bless em all. Content Warning.
Nancy pulls the blind tight against the sunlight. In this side room, the ward’s buzzers and beeps are muffled, distant. The fluorescent light flickers, highlighting white stubble on Rod's face, as he lies against the pillows. Ken stares as the taped cannula metronomically drips colourless liquid. Wife and son sit sentry at his deathbed as the monitor counts out his heart’s closing rhythm. Nancy’s tears slip down her face as she holds his thin, liver-spotted hand. Ken, face harrowed by helplessness, plucks at the bedsheet.
By Keith Butlerabout 5 hours ago in Writers
How to Train Your Dog in Just One Week
Dog training can seem like a long, difficult process, but with consistency, patience, and the right technique, you can teach your dog basic obedience in just one week. Of course, some habits take longer to solidify — but a focused seven-day plan can get your dog on the path to being well-behaved and responsive.
By Paw Planet about 5 hours ago in Petlife
The Overlooked Mechanics of Balance: Why Stability Starts Below the Knees
Balance is often associated with core strength or posture, but the mechanics of stability begin much lower in the body. The feet and ankles are the first point of contact with the ground, making them responsible for detecting changes in movement. Before larger muscles engage, the ankles send information through the nervous system that guides how the body adjusts and maintains equilibrium.
By AhmedFitLifeabout 5 hours ago in Longevity
Met Éireann Urges Vigilance as Orange and Yellow Rain Warnings in Effect. AI-Generated.
Met Éireann, the national meteorological service of Ireland, has issued a series of urgent weather warnings, including Orange and Yellow alerts, as heavy rainfall continues to impact large portions of the country. With the weather forecast indicating persistent and intense downpours over the coming days, authorities are urging the public to remain vigilant, particularly in areas most susceptible to flooding and severe weather conditions. Heavy Rainfall and Potential Flooding The Orange weather warning, the second-highest alert level in Ireland, is currently in effect for several counties, including Galway, Clare, and parts of Limerick. This alert indicates that significant rainfall could lead to localized flooding, as well as difficult driving conditions due to the accumulation of water on roads. Met Éireann has cautioned that rainfall totals may exceed 40 mm in some areas, with more intense bursts likely to occur over a relatively short period of time. In addition to the Orange warning, a Yellow alert has been issued for a wider swath of the country, including the entire eastern coast, Munster, and parts of the Midlands. While the Yellow warning is the less severe of the two, it still highlights the potential for hazardous conditions, including surface water flooding and poor visibility. The accumulation of rainwater, combined with strong winds, may create challenging conditions for motorists and pedestrians alike, making travel unsafe in some regions. The Causes Behind the Storms The heavy rainfall is being caused by a low-pressure system sweeping across the Atlantic, bringing with it intense showers and gusty winds. These weather systems are common during the autumn and winter months in Ireland, but this particular storm is notable for its widespread impact and persistent nature. The system is expected to linger over Ireland for several days, keeping the nation under the threat of continued heavy rain and strong winds. Meteorologists at Met Éireann have explained that the storms are drawing moisture from the Atlantic, causing the already saturated ground to absorb even more water. This increases the risk of localized flooding, especially in areas that have already experienced heavy rain in recent weeks. With more rain expected to fall throughout the week, concerns are mounting that rivers may overflow, and drains could become blocked, exacerbating flooding issues. Impact on Transportation and Infrastructure The weather warnings are expected to have a significant impact on transportation across the country. Motorists are being urged to exercise extreme caution while driving, especially on rural roads and in areas known to be prone to flooding. The increased risk of aquaplaning and reduced visibility due to heavy rain means that drivers should adjust their speed and avoid driving through standing water. Rail services have also been affected, with potential disruptions to some routes due to flood risks and safety concerns. Met Éireann has warned that some railway tracks may be impassable in certain parts of the country, particularly in the west and south. Passengers are advised to check with Irish Rail for real-time updates on service delays or cancellations. In addition, the aviation sector could face minor delays, as low visibility and strong winds may cause temporary issues at airports. The National Roads Authority (NRA) and local authorities have been working to clear any blocked drains, but the heavy rainfall may quickly overwhelm efforts to manage surface water. Safety Tips and Preparedness Met Éireann is strongly advising the public to take precautions to stay safe during the stormy period. For those living in flood-prone areas, it is crucial to be aware of any flood warnings issued by the local authorities and to take immediate action if flooding becomes imminent. People should avoid driving or walking through flooded areas, as even shallow waters can pose serious risks. For those living in coastal regions, the public is being reminded that high tides, combined with strong winds, may cause coastal flooding and erosion. It is recommended to stay away from exposed areas, such as beaches, cliffs, and harbors, during this time. Homeowners are also advised to check that drains, gutters, and downpipes are clear of debris to prevent water from backing up. Those in rural areas should take steps to secure outdoor furniture, equipment, and anything else that could be blown away in the strong winds. If you live in an area where flooding is a particular concern, it is wise to have an emergency kit with essentials such as flashlights, batteries, and a first-aid kit. The Role of Local Authorities Local authorities across Ireland have been working closely with Met Éireann to ensure that the public is kept informed of weather updates and to prepare for any potential flooding. In high-risk areas, sandbags are being distributed to protect properties from water damage, and emergency teams are on standby to address any flooding that may occur. In addition, Irish Water has been monitoring the potential for stormwater overflow, and is prepared to take emergency action if needed. Irish Water has warned the public that sewage systems could be overwhelmed by the heavy rainfall, and it is important for residents to avoid flushing non-biodegradable items, as this can exacerbate blockages. Looking Ahead: What’s Next for the Weather? The current Orange and Yellow warnings are expected to remain in effect throughout the week, with intermittent heavy rain continuing to affect much of the country. The low-pressure system that is driving the wet weather is forecast to weaken by the weekend, although there may still be isolated showers and wet conditions in some areas. While the weather outlook improves slightly as the system moves away, it’s important to remain cautious, as rain showers and localized flooding could still pose a risk. Met Éireann will continue to monitor the situation closely, and updates will be provided through their website and social media channels. Conclusion With the Orange and Yellow rain warnings now in effect, Met Éireann is urging the public to stay vigilant and take appropriate precautions to protect themselves and their property. Heavy rainfall, flooding, and transportation disruptions are expected over the next few days, and it’s crucial for people to stay informed and ready to act. As always, when dealing with severe weather, preparation and awareness are key to minimizing the risks and ensuring safety for all.
By Fiaz Ahmed about 5 hours ago in Earth
No, Billie Eilish, Americans Are Not Thieves on Stolen Land. AI-Generated.
Billie Eilish, the Grammy-winning American pop star, has recently stirred up controversy with a statement during one of her concerts where she remarked, "Americans are thieves on stolen land." While the singer’s intention may have been to highlight historical injustices, particularly in relation to the treatment of Indigenous peoples in the U.S., the statement is problematic for several reasons. It oversimplifies complex historical realities and misrepresents the modern-day American identity. The comment, though seemingly reflective of growing awareness about issues such as colonialism, exploitation, and displacement, does not fully acknowledge the nuances of U.S. history or the role contemporary Americans play in addressing past wrongs. While historical injustices are undeniable, it’s critical to examine what it means to be an American today and how we approach reconciliation with the land’s original inhabitants. The Historical Context: Colonization and Its Legacy It’s important to acknowledge the historic truths behind Eilish's statement. The United States was, indeed, built on the land that was originally inhabited by Indigenous peoples. European settlers, beginning with the arrival of Columbus in the 15th century, engaged in a systematic campaign to take control of Native American territories. These actions resulted in widespread violence, forced displacement, broken treaties, and genocide. The U.S. government’s policies of the 19th century, such as the forced removal of Native Americans to reservations and the expansionist doctrine of Manifest Destiny, contributed further to the devastation of Indigenous cultures and societies. The land was taken, and many Native communities lost everything — their homes, their land, and in many cases, their lives. This is a painful reality that cannot and should not be overlooked. However, the critical aspect here is that history cannot be reduced to a simple narrative of "thieves on stolen land." While the U.S. government’s actions in the 18th and 19th centuries have left a deep scar, modern Americans live in a vastly different context, one in which the acknowledgement of these wrongs and efforts toward justice and reconciliation are actively being pursued. Evolving America: A Nation in Flux To frame modern Americans as "thieves on stolen land" ignores the complexity of today’s U.S. and the efforts being made by individuals and groups to correct historical wrongs. Since the civil rights movements, the U.S. has undergone significant social and political changes. Laws protecting the rights of marginalized groups, including Native Americans, have been passed, and federal recognition of Indigenous tribes and nations has been a central part of the evolving American political landscape. In recent decades, Indigenous rights activists, politicians, and organizations have worked tirelessly to reclaim land, preserve culture, and revitalize Native languages. In addition to this, many non-Indigenous Americans support these movements and engage in ongoing conversations about the reparative steps that need to be taken. For instance, land acknowledgments — formal statements recognizing the traditional owners of land — have become a significant part of educational, cultural, and governmental institutions, including those that host concerts like Eilish’s. The recognition of past mistakes does not make contemporary Americans complicit in them. Many modern-day Americans are involved in reparative work, fighting for the rights of Indigenous peoples and acknowledging the painful legacy of colonialism. The U.S. is a country that has been shaped by numerous waves of immigrants, each of whom has their own unique history and connection to the land. This multi-ethnic and multi-racial identity cannot be erased by blanket generalizations, nor should it be. The Importance of Nuanced Dialogue While Billie Eilish’s comment may have been well-intentioned, it oversimplifies the narrative of American history and identity. Art, music, and performance can be a powerful means of raising awareness about social and political issues. Eilish has used her platform to speak out on climate change, mental health, and various social justice causes, which are undoubtedly important. However, statements like "Americans are thieves on stolen land" undermine the importance of nuanced discourse about the complexities of historical injustices and modern-day efforts for justice and reparations. Rather than adopting a defeatist view that casts contemporary Americans as inherently guilty of crimes they did not commit, it would be more constructive to focus on the path forward — on the steps that individuals, communities, and governments can take to redress past wrongs. For example, supporting Indigenous-led environmental initiatives, promoting the return of Native lands, and increasing public awareness of Indigenous cultures are all constructive ways to engage with this issue. Furthermore, such broad statements can alienate those who are already working toward a better future. The reality is that in a diverse country like the U.S., many people are committed to addressing the wrongs of the past and righting the injustices faced by Indigenous peoples. This commitment should not be dismissed. The Role of Native Voices in the Conversation It is essential to listen to and amplify the voices of Indigenous communities themselves in discussions about the land and historical injustices. The very communities that have been displaced for centuries are the ones that should lead the conversation on how the U.S. can move forward. It is their experiences, perspectives, and wishes that must guide the way the nation reconciles with its past. Acknowledging the pain of colonization and displacement is vital, but it must be done through meaningful engagement with Indigenous people rather than making blanket statements about all Americans. Native leaders such as Deb Haaland, the first Native American cabinet secretary in U.S. history, and Russell Means, the late activist and actor, have done remarkable work to bring awareness to the historical and ongoing challenges faced by Indigenous communities. Their leadership demonstrates that the focus should be on creating tangible change and supporting the right of Indigenous people to determine their own future. Conclusion: Beyond the Blanket Statements Billie Eilish’s comment may have been intended to spark conversation about the treatment of Indigenous peoples, but its oversimplification of a complex issue is problematic. While it is essential to recognize and confront the historical injustices committed by colonial powers, contemporary America is not a monolith. Rather than casting all Americans as guilty of past wrongs, we should focus on recognizing the efforts being made to correct these injustices and building a future where Indigenous voices are heard and respected. In the end, the conversation should not be about guilt, but about collaboration, empathy, and a commitment to justice. By focusing on the positive steps being taken to address historical wrongs, we can move towards a more inclusive future where all people, regardless of their background, can share in the prosperity and peace of the land.
By Fiaz Ahmed about 5 hours ago in The Swamp
CNA Explains: Why China Mattered in the Expiry of the Last US–Russia Nuclear Treaty. AI-Generated.
The collapse of the last major nuclear arms control agreement between the United States and Russia, the New START treaty, has triggered significant concern in international diplomatic and security circles. While the treaty's expiry in 2026 was largely driven by the geopolitical dynamics between the U.S. and Russia, the role of China looms large in the background. Beijing’s growing nuclear arsenal and refusal to be part of the treaty negotiations became a key factor that complicated discussions between Washington and Moscow, driving both nations toward a new phase in the arms race. Background: The End of New START The New Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty (New START), signed in 2010 by Presidents Barack Obama and Dmitry Medvedev, was the last remaining arms control agreement between the U.S. and Russia after a series of Cold War-era treaties were abandoned or expired. The treaty imposed limits on the number of deployed nuclear warheads, delivery systems, and missile defense systems, with an aim to curb the further spread of nuclear weapons and ensure transparency between the two countries. However, the expiration of the treaty at the beginning of 2026 marks a crucial shift in the nuclear arms control landscape. Over the past decade, both the U.S. and Russia have pointed to one primary reason for the growing irrelevance of arms control treaties: the rise of China as a nuclear power. With Beijing accelerating its nuclear capabilities and refusing to engage in arms control talks, the U.S. and Russia have found it increasingly difficult to address their nuclear arsenals without considering China’s growing nuclear stockpile. China's Nuclear Growth: A Strategic Concern China’s nuclear policy has historically been characterized by its minimalist approach — maintaining a relatively small arsenal under the principle of "no first use" (NFU), which signified its commitment to not being the first to deploy nuclear weapons in a conflict. However, in recent years, China has significantly expanded its nuclear weapons capabilities, which has stirred growing unease in Washington and Moscow. The Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI) estimates that China has increased its nuclear warhead stockpile by over 30% in the past decade, with plans to build a nuclear triad capable of delivering missiles from land, air, and sea. This expansion is part of China’s broader military modernization efforts, which include the development of new intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs), nuclear-capable submarines, and advanced missile defense systems. Unlike Russia and the U.S., China has not agreed to engage in multilateral arms control talks, leading both superpowers to question the fairness and effectiveness of a nuclear treaty that leaves out the third-largest nuclear power. The U.S. and Russia's Dilemma The U.S. and Russia have both acknowledged that arms control efforts are no longer effective in the absence of China’s involvement. In 2019, the U.S. withdrew from the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces (INF) Treaty, accusing Russia of violating its terms, but also expressing frustration at China’s growing missile capabilities, which were not subject to the treaty’s limitations. Similarly, the Open Skies Treaty and other arms control agreements also began to unravel, with the issue of China's nuclear expansion surfacing as a key motivator for these exits. President Joe Biden and Russian President Vladimir Putin have expressed a desire to continue nuclear arms control talks, yet without China’s involvement, both sides are finding it difficult to agree on the next steps. The New START treaty’s expiration is thus viewed as a symbol of how difficult it has become to manage nuclear competition in the 21st century without including China in the framework. As both the U.S. and Russia focus on their strategic relations, China’s refusal to engage in arms control negotiations casts a shadow over any potential future agreements. China's Stance: Non-Engagement with Arms Control Talks China’s decision not to engage in nuclear arms control discussions is not a recent development. For years, Beijing has maintained that its nuclear stockpile is proportionate to its national defense needs and that it remains committed to its NFU policy. While this stance was reasonable during the Cold War, as China’s nuclear arsenal was far smaller than those of the U.S. and Russia, the dynamic has changed with Beijing’s ongoing military expansion. China has consistently rejected U.S. and Russian calls for including its nuclear capabilities in any future arms control agreements, arguing that its stockpile remains small in comparison to those of the U.S. and Russia, and that the U.S. should reduce its own nuclear forces first. The Chinese government views nuclear arms control agreements as a relic of the Cold War era and believes that they should evolve to reflect the changing global security environment. Beijing has also cited the fact that it faces no nuclear threat from its immediate neighbors, particularly from Russia, and as such, sees no immediate need to alter its nuclear posture. However, this position has led to frustration in Washington and Moscow. U.S. policymakers have argued that strategic stability cannot be achieved with a treaty framework that ignores China’s growing influence in the nuclear arena. Russia has expressed similar concerns, with some officials even suggesting that without China’s participation, arms control agreements between the U.S. and Russia are essentially futile. The Impact on Global Nuclear Stability The absence of China from arms control negotiations could have far-reaching consequences for global nuclear stability. As the U.S., Russia, and China account for more than 90% of the world’s nuclear warheads, a trilateral arms control agreement would be necessary for effective global non-proliferation efforts. Without such a framework, the risk of nuclear arms races and the potential for miscalculations in the use of nuclear weapons will continue to rise. In recent years, China has also pursued closer military cooperation with Russia, including joint military exercises and shared interests in countering U.S. global influence. This cooperation complicates the arms control situation even further, as a strategic alignment between the two nuclear powers raises concerns in Washington about the long-term balance of power. Possible Pathways Forward Despite the challenges, there are possible pathways for addressing these growing tensions. One approach could be for the U.S., Russia, and China to engage in trilateral talks with a focus on nuclear transparency and risk reduction. However, convincing China to participate in such discussions would require significant diplomatic engagement and a shift in Beijing’s long-standing stance on nuclear arms control. Another option could involve developing new arms control frameworks that consider the technological advancements of modern warfare, such as cyber capabilities, missile defense, and space-based weapons systems. As these technologies increasingly intertwine with nuclear deterrence, the next generation of arms control agreements may need to adapt to the realities of contemporary global security challenges. Conclusion The expiry of the New START treaty marks a pivotal moment in nuclear arms control, but it is not solely the result of U.S. and Russian dynamics. China’s growing nuclear capabilities and its refusal to join in arms control talks have played a crucial role in the breakdown of the arms control framework that once governed U.S.-Russia relations. As global security continues to evolve, the need for a new, inclusive approach to nuclear arms control is becoming more urgent. Whether this involves trilateral talks or new multilateral frameworks remains uncertain, but without China’s involvement, meaningful progress will be difficult to achieve.
By Fiaz Ahmed about 5 hours ago in The Swamp
Settling Into Marysville After a Move: What New Residents Often Discover. AI-Generated.
Moving to a new home in Marysville, Washington, is more than a logistical task. For many residents, it represents a gradual adjustment to a different pace of life. While the city remains close to larger urban centers, daily routines in Marysville tend to feel calmer and more grounded. This balance shapes how people settle in after a move.
By House Doctorabout 5 hours ago in Lifehack
Israeli air attacks on Lebanon reach highest level since ceasefire: Report. AI-Generated.
Israel’s airstrikes on Lebanon have escalated sharply in recent days, reaching their highest intensity since the ceasefire that brought an end to the 2006 Lebanon War. The Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) have launched a series of air attacks targeting Hezbollah positions in southern Lebanon, raising tensions along the volatile Israeli-Lebanese border. The renewed violence is triggering concerns over the potential for broader regional conflict, with both sides bracing for further escalation. Context of the Escalation The recent surge in airstrikes comes after months of simmering tension along the Lebanese-Israeli border. While the 2006 ceasefire agreement, brokered by the United Nations, was meant to end hostilities between Israel and Hezbollah, violations have been frequent on both sides. However, the intensity and frequency of the attacks seen in recent days represent a significant escalation and signal a possible shift in the fragile status quo. For Israel, the decision to increase airstrikes is part of a broader strategy to weaken Hezbollah’s military infrastructure and prevent what it perceives as an existential threat from the Lebanese group. Hezbollah, which has long been backed by Iran, has grown in strength and influence in the region, maintaining a strong presence in southern Lebanon. The group has engaged in a number of skirmishes and rocket attacks against Israeli forces, raising alarm in Jerusalem over its increasing capabilities. The Recent Surge in Israeli Airstrikes In the past two weeks alone, Israeli warplanes have bombarded several key Hezbollah strongholds, including arms depots, missile storage facilities, and command centers. According to the IDF, these operations are part of an effort to degrade Hezbollah’s offensive capabilities and prevent it from launching attacks against Israeli civilian and military targets. Israel’s airstrikes have primarily targeted areas near the towns of Tyre and Nabatieh, both of which are known Hezbollah strongholds. The increased intensity of airstrikes follows a series of Hezbollah rocket launches that targeted northern Israel, which Israeli officials have labeled as "provocations" designed to escalate the conflict. The Israeli government has also stated that it holds the Lebanese government responsible for Hezbollah’s actions, despite the group’s position as a powerful non-state actor within Lebanon. This framing has long been a point of contention, with critics arguing that it undermines Lebanon's sovereignty. Lebanese Civilian Casualties The humanitarian impact of these renewed Israeli strikes has been severe. Reports from Lebanese health officials confirm that at least 20 civilians have been killed in the past 10 days alone, with dozens more injured in airstrikes. While Hezbollah positions remain the primary target, civilian infrastructure, including roads, bridges, and power lines, has also been damaged. This has compounded the already dire economic and humanitarian situation in Lebanon, which is facing a severe economic collapse and a refugee crisis exacerbated by the Syrian conflict. The United Nations Interim Force in Lebanon (UNIFIL) has expressed grave concern about the worsening situation and the potential for further civilian casualties. UNIFIL's mandate is to monitor the ceasefire and prevent the flow of arms to Hezbollah, but its ability to influence the situation on the ground remains limited. The UN has called for both sides to de-escalate, but these calls have gone largely ignored. Hezbollah’s Response Hezbollah has responded with defiant rhetoric and military actions of its own. Hassan Nasrallah, the leader of Hezbollah, delivered a speech earlier this week vowing that the group would retaliate for Israeli airstrikes on Lebanese soil. "We will not allow Israel to continue violating Lebanon’s sovereignty," Nasrallah said in a televised address. "Hezbollah is prepared to defend Lebanon against any Israeli aggression." Hezbollah has also made it clear that it has the capacity to strike deep within Israeli territory. While rocket attacks from Hezbollah have been largely limited to areas near the border in the past, the group has hinted that it may expand its targets to include major Israeli cities, something that has not been seen since the 2006 war. The Israeli government has been careful not to publicly comment on the specifics of Hezbollah’s retaliatory capabilities, but officials have made it clear that Israel is fully prepared for a broader conflict if necessary. "We will not hesitate to take any action to defend our citizens," said an IDF spokesperson. The Risk of a Broader Conflict The recent violence comes at a particularly sensitive moment for both Israel and Lebanon. On one hand, Israel is facing domestic political instability, with ongoing protests over the government's judicial reforms, which have sparked widespread unrest. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is under pressure both domestically and internationally, making the current escalation potentially useful in rallying nationalistic support. On the other hand, Lebanon is in the midst of one of the worst economic crises in its history, with a collapsed currency, rampant inflation, and widespread poverty. The Lebanese government, which has limited control over Hezbollah’s actions, finds itself in a difficult position, as it cannot afford to antagonize Hezbollah, which has considerable political and military influence within Lebanon. The risk of a broader conflict, involving not only Hezbollah but also the Syrian regime and Iran, remains high. Iran, Hezbollah’s primary backer, has frequently expressed its support for Hezbollah’s actions, and it is feared that Israel’s escalating airstrikes could provoke further Iranian involvement. This scenario could quickly turn the current skirmishes into a full-blown regional conflict, with catastrophic consequences for Lebanon, Israel, and the wider Middle East. International Reactions The international community has reacted with concern, urging both Israel and Hezbollah to exercise restraint and avoid further escalation. The United States, a key ally of Israel, has expressed support for Israel’s right to defend itself but has also called on Israel to minimize civilian casualties in its airstrikes. U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken stated, "We urge all parties to de-escalate and return to the path of diplomacy." At the same time, the European Union has condemned the violence and called for an immediate halt to all military operations. The EU expressed concern that the airstrikes could further destabilize Lebanon and complicate efforts to resolve the ongoing Syrian conflict, which has already resulted in a massive refugee crisis in Lebanon. Conclusion As Israeli airstrikes on Lebanon continue to escalate, the region finds itself once again on the brink of broader conflict. The balance of power between Israel and Hezbollah remains delicate, with both sides engaged in a high-stakes game of brinkmanship. While the immediate outcome of these airstrikes remains uncertain, the risk of further violence and civilian casualties is growing by the day. The international community must continue to press for an immediate cessation of hostilities and urge both sides to return to the negotiation table. Until then, Muscat’s role in facilitating dialogue will remain as critical as ever, with hopes that diplomatic efforts can help defuse the powder keg that is the Israeli-Lebanese border.
By Fiaz Ahmed about 5 hours ago in The Swamp
