AI Isn't Replacing Writers, It's Replacing Readers

Every week, someone posts a dramatic headline about AI taking creative jobs. (And most other jobs, for that matter.)

I've done it.

"Writers are doomed." "Artists will vanish." "Journalism is dead."

But that's not really what's happening, is it? Not yet, at least.

So far, AI isn't replacing writers. And if it is, it's not doing a great job at it, because it's still easy to clearly tell when something was written or created entirely by AI, without human editing.

But there's another shift happening that's far ahead.

AI is replacing readers. The very people we write for.

And that's a much bigger problem.

Nobody's Reading

Open your feed in any app, social media network, or website.

Everything's a summary of a summary of a summary.

Tweets summarize articles. Articles summarize podcasts. Podcasts summarize books. Blogs summarize YouTube videos. It's all a summary of what already was a summary.

And now AI summarizes everything else. Again.

Content is so optimized you don't even have to read it. You just know the gist. Because there's little new there, to begin with. Almost any idea has already been written down, talked about, or recorded.

AI tools like Perplexity, Gemini, and ChatGPT simply turn the act of "reading" or "listening" into skimming on steroids.

We don't absorb. We extract. Quickly. Like crazy.

The question isn't "Will AI write our stories?"

It's "Will anyone still care to read them?"

The Death of Depth

People used to read to think. Now they "read" to get it over with.

AI is speeding up that shift. Why wrestle with a complex idea when you can ask an assistant to "summarize this in bullet points"…

It's like outsourcing curiosity. To machines.

And it's not only the creative jobs, no. Companies don't read job applications anymore, they let AI summarize and sort out the first round. I have taken multiple "first" interviews with an AI interviewer…

Then, humans take a look. If at all…

It's all related to reading, though. Reading was once a quiet conversation between minds. You and the author sat across time and space, exchanging ideas.

Now, it's just a quick second-hand transaction. Write → AI → Skim.

Writers pour thought into words, hopefully. AI distills those words into "key takeaways."

The Comfort of Being Skimmed

Now, skimming isn't bad. Right?

In fact, I am in favor of well-structured writing that can be skimmed to get the gist somewhat quickly.

And people like this. It's easier and quicker. Obviously. It also helps us consume more… faster.

We love the illusion of knowledge without the work.

But the issue is that AI doesn't just summarize, it flatters, and it somewhat influences. It tells us, "You're informed. You're efficient. You're caught up." And it might present the "key takeaways" one-sided.

The machines aren't taking over our creativity… yet. They're feeding our laziness.

Writers Are Still Writing

But to machines.

If you publish online, you've already noticed that, I bet. We're not just writing for humans anymore.

• We're writing for algorithms that decide who even sees our work, first.
• Then, that writing gets summarized by AI
• Then it gets skimmed by readers.
• And we keep going.

That shift started long before AI, too. SEO, keywords, metadata. We stuff that into out our content. Not for people. It's all about making your words readable for crawlers. That's nothing new.

But it's getting worse.

As more people use AI tools to "summarize this," most of our audience will experience our work through a model's interpretation.

Picture writing a novel and having it paraphrased by a robot before anyone reads it.

Writers won't disappear.

But human readership might.

Slowness

We writers love the romantic thought: If I spent time writing something, you'd spend time reading it.

That's collapsing.

AI breaks that contract because it doesn't care. It rewards speed, not depth.

But writing is somewhat slow, isn't it?

The pauses. The rewinds. The underlined sentences. The highlights.

There's really no shortcut to that. We can't prompt our way into goosebumps.

So maybe AI writing everything isn't the real problem.

The New Divide

We used to talk about the digital divide.

My parents love to talk about that. Those who had access to technology vs those who didn't. Those who understood technologies vs. those who didn't.

Many of the older generations know this feeling. They just can't keep up with all the new technology. Heck, I even feel that sometimes, and I am not even 40 yet.

But it's a new divide now. Maybe a worse one.

Now it's the cognitive divide. Those who still think deeply vs those who've outsourced thinking to machines.

AI make us comfortable. We like being comfortable. Who doesn't?

But if we let AI handle all the reading, what happens to nuance, to critical thought, to empathy?

Those are rarely "key takeaways"…

The Bottom Line

AI isn't replacing writers. It's replacing readers.

It's turning ideas into snacks and stories into summaries. It's flattening our creativity.

Maybe the people who will matter most in the next decade aren't the ones who can prompt faster or publish more, but the ones who still read the whole thing.

When everyone else skims, the reader becomes the rarest mind in the room.

---

A writer is nothing without a reader. If you found this helpful, consider becoming my dear email friend. Nothing would make me happier.