Journal logo

What Brands Get Wrong About Influencers

Why marketing teams keep misreading influence and how real connection gets lost in the process

By Nina RaffertyPublished 3 months ago 3 min read
What Brands Get Wrong About Influencers
Photo by dlxmedia.hu on Unsplash

There is a strange moment that happens in many marketing teams. Someone pulls up a list of potential influencers, the room leans in, and everyone goes straight to the follower count. It is almost automatic. A big number feels safe, and a small number feels risky. Yet this is the very place where most mistakes start.

Influencers are not billboards. They are not interchangeable. They are people who built an audience through personality, taste, humor, or simple persistence. When a brand forgets this, everything that follows begins to wobble.

When the Metrics Replace the Voice

A familiar pattern shows up in campaigns that fail to connect. A team chooses creators purely by reach. It feels efficient. It feels logical. The problem is that reach is only the surface.

There are creators with modest audiences who hold more trust than profiles with half a million followers. Their comment sections are full of small conversations. Their audiences remember details from past posts.

One fashion brand once hired a creator with a huge audience to show a new collection. The content looked expensive. The light was perfect. The comments were not. Most people scrolled past because the post felt like an ad wearing influencer clothing.

A smaller creator later shared her own take on the same collection. She filmed it on the floor of her bedroom while trying on outfits and laughing at herself. Her video became the one people saved and shared. The difference was not talent. It was connection.

The Misunderstanding of Control

Many brands want to guide every detail of a collaboration. They write captions, approve every angle, and design the tone. By the time the content reaches the public, the influencer’s voice is barely there.

Influence works only when the creator sounds like themselves. Audiences are sensitive to tone. They know when something feels planted. The moment the brand removes the creator’s own cadence, the magic dissolves.

A creator cannot translate a brand’s message if the brand blocks the language the audience understands.

Popularity Is Not the Same as Influence

There is a temptation to treat every viral moment as evidence of influence. Yet virality does not equal trust. Many creators who go viral struggle to persuade their audiences to click, save, or buy. People watch them with curiosity, not loyalty.

True influence appears in small signals. Honest comments. Repeat engagement. Followers who return even on slow days. These signals matter far more than the scale of the audience.

Some teams now turn to analytical platforms to study these patterns. They use Plixi to understand the deeper structure of a creator’s engagement and to see how real the connection is. This approach helps them choose partners with actual influence rather than superficial visibility.

The Fear of Letting Creators Be Themselves

Another common mistake is the fear of imperfection. Brands want clean edges and polished frames. Influencers build trust through the opposite. They show their messy rooms, their bad hair days, the moments when things go off script.

One creator once received a detailed brief instructing her to present a skincare product in a “calm, luxurious atmosphere.” She filmed it, felt nothing, and filmed a second take while sitting on her bathroom floor wearing a towel. The second video performed three times better. Her audience did not want the surface. They wanted her.

When Relationships Replace Transactions

Brands often treat influencer collaborations as one-off deals. A post here, a story there. Quick, efficient, transactional. But audiences respond more deeply to creators who genuinely like what they share.

The strongest campaigns happen when a brand builds long term relationships. Over time, the creator becomes an interpreter. They weave the product into their own world in a way that makes sense. They are not performing. They are integrating.

The Ending That Does Not Try to Be a Lesson

There is no universal formula for influence. Every creator speaks a different language. Every audience listens with a different ear. The mistake brands make is believing they can force consistency where only authenticity thrives.

Influencers are not engines for reach. They are bridges. They carry messages across communities that feel alive, unpredictable, emotional, and real.

The brands that win are the ones that stop treating influencers as tools and start treating them as collaborators. Everyone else keeps wondering why the perfect campaign falls flat.

social media

About the Creator

Nina Rafferty

I’m a writer with a strong interest in technology and how it shapes our daily lives. I enjoy breaking down complex topics into clear, engaging content that’s easy for anyone to understand

Reader insights

Be the first to share your insights about this piece.

How does it work?

Add your insights

Comments

There are no comments for this story

Be the first to respond and start the conversation.

Sign in to comment

    Find us on social media

    Miscellaneous links

    • Explore
    • Contact
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms of Use
    • Support

    © 2026 Creatd, Inc. All Rights Reserved.