Between the Algorithm and Inspiration: Can a Writer Be a Good AI Trainer? 🤖✍️
From System Glitches to Literary Bridges: My Journey Between Algorithms and Authorship

Working in AI training while being a writer is a combination that, at first glance, sounds like being a part-time clown and a part-time gravedigger. 🤡⚰️ Absurd, seemingly contradictory, and yet, in my life, inseparable. Choosing AI was a conscious move, driven by a curiosity about tomorrow, but writing... that came a moment earlier, almost as an act of survival.
Back in the UK, while I was meticulously ruining my life with addiction, my partner threw out a short, motivating line: "Just write something." 🇬🇧🥃 That was the spark I needed to step out of the shadows. Six months later, I was holding my debut novella – 404: Reality Not Found. Today, looking back, I see that these two worlds don’t just coexist; they feed off each other, creating a unique professional symbiosis. 🔄
The Architecture of Commands: Prompting as a New Grammar 💻
In the world of AI, everything revolves around prompting. It’s a term that has entered the mainstream in recent years, but it’s still often understood too superficially. It’s not just "talking to a computer." It is an advanced process of instruction design that requires almost surgical linguistic precision. 🩺
When I train a model, I operate with two currencies: precision and context.
Precision: In prompting, every word carries weight. Using a term that is too general causes the model to "drift" into hallucinations or drown us in a stream of clichés. I must define the role (persona), the objective (task), and the strict limitations (constraints). 🎯
Context: This is the absolute king. AI possesses no intuition or default knowledge of my intentions. I have to build a "stage" for it – provide historical background, specify the desired tone, and set the output format. Prompting is, in reality, sculpting raw logic using the chisel of natural language. 🏛️
The Literary World: The Same Struggle, Different Tools 📚
When I switch into writer mode, I experience the exact same processes, though they are served in a much more emotional, "gritty" sauce. My experiences with AI have taught me to look at a text as a system of interconnected vessels. 🧪
Context in a Novel: This is nothing other than world-building. If I don’t establish the emotional context of a character for the reader, their scream at the climax will be nothing but a dead mark on paper. Just as an AI model needs input data to generate a meaningful response, a reader needs cognitive layers to believe in the fiction. In 404: Reality Not Found, every glitch in reality had to have its logical roots – otherwise, it would just be a cheap special effect. 🎥
The Economy of the Word: As an AI trainer, I learn to eliminate noise. As a writer, I fight for that one, perfect sentence. Choosing the wrong adjective in a key scene can destroy a painstakingly built atmosphere of dread or melancholy. In both professions, I act as a "guardian of meaning" – ensuring that a word doesn't just fill space, but performs exactly the job I assigned to it. 💂♂️
The Ethics of Code, the Ethics of Conscience ⚖️
In AI training, we often deal with ethics – placing "guardrails" on models to prevent them from echoing harmful biases. It’s a fascinating process that has forced me to reflect on my own creative work. As a writer, during my "404 error" period in the UK, I was filled with my own biases against the world and myself. Today, as I train algorithms, I see how difficult it is to define objective "good." However, in literature, I don’t want "clean" models. I want characters who stumble, who are politically incorrect in their agony, and who haven't been passed through a safety filter. It is precisely there, in the gray zone between correctness and instinct, where true art is born.
Symbiosis Instead of Rivalry 🤝
I am often asked: "Will AI replace writers?" My answer is: it will replace those who write like machines. If your texts are merely a statistical average of popular phrases, you have reason to worry. But if you pour your unique "error code" into your sentences – the things you experienced at rock bottom and what allowed you to bounce back – you are safe. AI has become my most demanding editor. It shows me what is predictable, forcing me to search for metaphors that no probability-based algorithm would ever conceive. This isn't an arms race; it's a training in mindfulness.
The Trap of Mechanization and the Gift of Imagination ✨
Does working with AI kill creativity? That’s the question I hear most often. The truth is subversive: training models makes me realize how powerful human unpredictability really is. AI operates on statistics – it chooses the most probable next word. A writer, however, thrives on the improbable. 🎲
My work with algorithms is a constant communion with the "averageness" of language, which paradoxically forces me to seek something in my own texts that a machine cannot (yet) fake: authentic pain, the grit of my UK experiences, and that specific human tendency to wander. AI gives me discipline and technical clarity; literature gives me the freedom to be illogical. 🕊️
Today, these two professions are two sides of the same coin. On one side, cold calculation and the optimization of communication with a machine; on the other, the feverish pouring of emotions onto paper. Both paths, however, require humility toward language. Because regardless of whether the recipient is a processor or another human being, the word remains the most powerful tool we have ever created. 🌍🔥
About the Creator
Piotr Nowak
Pole in Italy ✈️ | AI | Crypto | Online Earning | Book writer | Every read supports my work on Vocal



Comments
There are no comments for this story
Be the first to respond and start the conversation.